[dmarc-discuss] External Reporting Address

[Monica Chew]

Hello Enrico,

I had to implement aggressive caching of non-existent DMARC records to
reduce lookups and get DNS team off my back :) Non-existent records are
cached up to 24 hours, so your record may not be discovered for up to 1
day. Gmail only sends aggregate reports, not AFRFs. We send once daily if
there is traffic from the domain, and we do send to external reporting
addresses. There is no minimum number of messages to produce an aggregate
report at this time.

Thanks,
Monica

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Enrico Lampugnani <lampugnani at mailup.com>wrote:

> Hi everyone,****
>
> I’m testing DMARC on the dmarc.r53.it  domain, now only for monitoring
> purpose (I’m using p=none).****
>
> Sending several test messages to @gmail.com and @aol.com destinations I
> don’t see any feedback message arriving.****
>
> For “rua” and “ruf” I use external reporting addresses.****
>
> I have three questions: ****
>
> **1)      **Is there a minimum number of messages you need to send for
> being able to receive aggregate reports?****
>
> **2)      **Are the “ruf” feedback massages sent back in real time ?****
>
> **3)      **Can cause any problem using external reporting address ?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you.****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> Enrico****
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://medusa.blackops.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20120203/d8cde271/attachment.htm>