[dmarc-discuss] Display Names (was Re: Multiple From: addresses, (was Re: Several remarks)

[Steven M Jones]

On 01/31/2012 12:06 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:05:30 -0500
> "David F. Skoll"<dfs at roaringpenguin.com>  wrote:
>> That DMARC software normalize the display name if it thinks there
>> might be any confusion.
> Which, of course, breaks DKIM.  But presumably DKIM has already been checked
> and shouldn't be subject to further checking by downstream software. :)

In addition to Andrew Sullivan's point, if we implemented this then 
don't we lose the case where a valid DKIM signature on an unaltered 
message allows for numerous forwarding scenarios to work under DMARC?

--/S/.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://medusa.blackops.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20120131/594125e6/attachment.htm>