[dmarc-discuss] Display Names (was Re: Multiple From: addresses, (was Re: Several remarks)
Steven M Jones
smj+dmarcdiscuss at crash.com
Tue Jan 31 13:29:34 PST 2012
On 01/31/2012 12:06 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:05:30 -0500
> "David F. Skoll"<dfs at roaringpenguin.com> wrote:
>> That DMARC software normalize the display name if it thinks there
>> might be any confusion.
> Which, of course, breaks DKIM. But presumably DKIM has already been checked
> and shouldn't be subject to further checking by downstream software. :)
In addition to Andrew Sullivan's point, if we implemented this then
don't we lose the case where a valid DKIM signature on an unaltered
message allows for numerous forwarding scenarios to work under DMARC?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dmarc-discuss