[dmarc-discuss] Multiple From: addresses (was Re: Several remarks)

Michael Adkins madkins at fb.com
Tue Jan 31 11:47:37 PST 2012


>
>I also am not crazy about Section 15.2 because there are legitimate
>reasons for including an email address in the "display name" part of
>the header.  Our ticketing system does something close:
>
>    From: "customer at example.org via RT" <support at roaringpenguin.com>


The display name field is going to be really hard to deal with going
forward.  There's going to be a lot of private experimentation around how
to prevent abuse of it before we end up with consensus for a standard
approach.  Do we need to make it clearer that those are only just some
suggestions based on currently planned experiments?  I'd hate for anyone
to think those were required.


>
>Regards,
>
>David.
>_______________________________________________
>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
>http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
>terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)




More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list